Vatican
The Power of the DogIn the novel, the Vatican is the potential destination for revelations that could expose the political and covert activities of Opus Dei. Its significance lies in the decision made before those revelations arrive: church leaders and an influential member of the order treat disclosure as a threat to the Church’s position in Mexico and to wider political objectives, and agree to suppress the information rather than pass it to the Pope.
The Vatican as a Potential Recipient
Sal Scachi phones Girolamo Antonucci to say that he wants to relay important information to the Pope. The information concerns Juan Parada’s effort to bring evidence to the Vatican, with Cerro identified as someone who knows enough to bring down the Mexican government. The proposed communication therefore places the Vatican at the far end of a chain of testimony and political risk: it is approached as an authority that might hear the evidence, but the people discussing it decide that it must not.
Opus Dei and the Politics of Disclosure
The crisis is sharpened by Opus Dei’s relationship with the Pope. Antonucci notes that the Pope has strongly supported the order and recently advanced the beatification of its founder, a step toward canonization. For Scachi, a member of Opus Dei whose anti-Communist campaigns have included Vietnam, Cambodia, the Golden Triangle, Mexico, Central America through Cerberus, and South America through Red Mist, the prospect of Parada’s disclosures threatens to expose the order’s involvement in harsh actions against Communist opponents. The revelation would embarrass the Pope as well as the order.
The possible consequences extend beyond the Church’s reputation. Mexico is negotiating to restore the Church’s full legal status, and Antonucci fears that disclosure would scuttle the negotiations and weaken the government. He also portrays liberation theologians as a political danger, reasoning that their increased influence could help bring Communist rule. The novel presents this reasoning as the framework through which the men recast concealment as protection of the faithful and the Church’s future.
Suppression as a Political Bargain
Antonucci argues that keeping the information from the Pope could help return the Church to the Mexican people by earning the government’s gratitude. Scachi confirms the implication: the means to that religious and political objective is suppressing the evidence. The decision also has an international economic stake. With the North American Free Trade Agreement still under debate in Congress, Scachi believes that public revelations could derail it and threaten the prospect of a Mexican middle class, which he regards as a long-term defense against Communism.
The Vatican’s role in this episode is thus defined by a choice made in its name and on its behalf, rather than by a direct action shown from the institution itself. The characters invoke the Pope, the Church’s legal status in Mexico, and the supposed greater good to justify withholding information. Religious authority becomes part of a political calculation in which institutional standing, government stability, and anti-Communist policy are treated as reasons to keep evidence from the very recipient who might judge it.